Big Law Firms Resist Trump’s Onslaught Amidst Legal Battles

In a significant development within the legal sector, major law firms are increasingly resisting involvement in cases related to former President Donald Trump. Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison and Jenner & Block have notably declined to represent Trump, citing conflicts of interest and ethical concerns. This resistance comes amid a flurry of legal battles Trump faces, which have put considerable pressure on the legal industry.

Reports from The New York Times and The Boston Globe highlight the growing tension between Trump's legal needs and the reluctance of prestigious law firms to engage. Paul Weiss, for instance, turned down an opportunity to work on a Trump-related deal, emphasizing their commitment to maintaining a neutral stance in politically charged cases. Similarly, Jenner & Block's refusal to represent Trump has led to a White House statement addressing the risks associated with the firm's decision.

This situation underscores a broader trend where law firms are carefully navigating their involvement in high-profile political cases, balancing professional obligations with ethical considerations. The legal community's response to Trump's legal challenges continues to evolve, reflecting the complex interplay between law, politics, and ethics in the United States.

• Donald Trump
• Jenner & Block
• Paul Weiss
• White House

Related issues news

What is Jenner and Block?

Jenner & Block LLP (Jenner) is yet another law firm that has abandoned the profession's highest ideals, condoned partisan “lawfare,” and abused its pro bono practice to engage in activities that undermine justice and the interests of the United States.

Are executive orders legal?

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that all executive orders from the president of the United States must be supported by the Constitution, whether from a clause granting specific power, or by Congress delegating such to the executive branch.